Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

People v. Utsey

22 A.D.3d 268

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
2005-10-11
Topic
antitrust

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John E Collins, J.), rendered April 22, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed. The penalty reduction provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738) do not apply to defendants sentenced prior to its enactment (People v Walker, 81 NY2d 661, 666-667 [1993]), and we reject defendant’s arguments to the contrary. Since defendant received the minimum sentence permitted by law, this Court has no authority to reduce it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (CPL 470.20 [6]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Utsey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John E Collins, J.), rendered April 22, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The penalty reduction provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738) do not apply to defendants sentenced prior to its enactment (People v Walker, 81 NY2d 661, 666-667 [1993]), and we reject defendant’s arguments to the contrary. Since defendant received the minimum sentence permitted by law, this Court has no authority to reduce it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (CPL 470.20 [6]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Friedman and Sweeny, JJ.