Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Komolov v. Segal

117 A.D.3d 557

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
2014-05-20
Topic
general

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the thirteenth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The thirteenth cause of action for unjust enrichment is precluded in this case because it seeks precisely the same relief that was barred by the statute of frauds. Concur — Gonzalez, RJ., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Kapnick, JJ.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Komolov v. Segal. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the thirteenth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The thirteenth cause of action for unjust enrichment is precluded in this case because it seeks precisely the same relief that was barred by the statute of frauds.

Concur — Gonzalez, RJ., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Kapnick, JJ.