Opinion · Nylaw New York

RICHARDSON v. MILLARD, 33 A.D.2d 944 [3d Dept 1970]

JOSEPH RICHARDSON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MILLARD, Defendant, & G.E. VANVORST Co., Inc., Appellant., 33 A.D.2d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1970)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1970-01-20
Topic: general

RICHARDSON v. MILLARD, 33 A.D.2d 944 [3d Dept 1970] JOSEPH RICHARDSON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MILLARD, Defendant, and G.E. VANVORST COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. January 20, 1970 Motion for reargument and for amendment of notice of appeal.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RICHARDSON v. MILLARD, 33 A.D.2d 944 [3d Dept 1970]. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RICHARDSON v. MILLARD,33 A.D.2d 944[3d Dept 1970]

JOSEPH RICHARDSON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MILLARD, Defendant, and G.E. VAN

VORST COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

January 20, 1970

Motion for reargument and for amendment of notice of appeal. Reargument and amendment of notice of appeal to substitute "G.E. Van Vorst Company, Incorporated" in place of "William Millard" as party appellant granted, without costs. Upon reargument, order affirmed, without costs. Reynolds, J.P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.