Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Lake Anne Realty Corp. v. Goldberg

Lake Anne Realty Corp. v. Goldberg, 231 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 1996)

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1996-09-09
Topic
litigation

In a summary proceeding to recover possession of certain leased premises, the landlord appeals, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated March 22, 1995, which reversed a judgment of the Justice Court, Orange County (Turpin, J.), dated September 23, 1993, awarding possession of the premises to the landlord, and thereupon dismissed the petition. Ordered that the order of the Appellate Term is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the judgment of the Justice Court is reinstated. The Appellate Term erred in concluding that the landlord was not entitled to recover possession of the premises inasmuch as the lease for the premises was assigned by the tenants Leonard and Thelma Goldberg to Pauline Goughian without requesting the consent of the landlord (see, Real Property Law § 226-b [1], [5]). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lake Anne Realty Corp. v. Goldberg. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

In a summary proceeding to recover possession of certain leased premises, the landlord appeals, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated March 22, 1995, which reversed a judgment of the Justice Court, Orange County (Turpin, J.), dated September 23, 1993, awarding possession of the premises to the landlord, and thereupon dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order of the Appellate Term is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the judgment of the Justice Court is reinstated.

The Appellate Term erred in concluding that the landlord was not entitled to recover possession of the premises inasmuch as the lease for the premises was assigned by the tenants Leonard and Thelma Goldberg to Pauline Goughian without requesting the consent of the landlord (see, Real Property Law § 226-b [1], [5]). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.