Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.

Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc., 98 N.J. 266 (N.J. 1985)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1985-01-31
Topic
international-arbitration

98 N.J. 266 (1985) 486 A.2d 334 KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
98 N.J. 266 (1985) 486 A.2d 334

KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, GEORGE H. FRIEDMAN AND CAROL MOFFATT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 7, 1985. Decided January 31, 1985.

*267 Merritt T. Viscardi argued the cause for appellant (Apruzzese & McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys).

Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for respondent Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. (Conway & Reiseman and Shannon Z. Taylor, attorneys).

Robert M. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents American Arbitration Association, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt (Amdur & Friedrich, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 196 N.J. Super. 16 (1984).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI — 6.

For reversal — None.