Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Sokolov v. Village of Freeport

74 A.D.2d 822

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1980-03-03
Topic
general

In an action, inter alia, to declare a certain ordinance of the Village of Freeport invalid, the defendant Village of Freeport appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 20, 1979, which declared the ordinance invalid. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, the ordinance is declared to be valid and the complaint is otherwise *823dismissed. We held in Loventhal v City of Mount Vernon (51 AD2d 732) that an ordinance requiring dwelling owners to obtain a permit before letting a unit was a valid exercise of the police power and did not infringe on the owners’ Fourth Amendment rights. There is no significant difference between the instant ordinance and that involved in Loventhal. Lazer, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sokolov v. Village of Freeport. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

In an action, inter alia, to declare a certain ordinance of the Village of Freeport invalid, the defendant Village of Freeport appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 20, 1979, which declared the ordinance invalid. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, the ordinance is declared to be valid and the complaint is otherwise *823 dismissed. We held in Loventhal v City of Mount Vernon (51 AD2d 732) that an ordinance requiring dwelling owners to obtain a permit before letting a unit was a valid exercise of the police power and did not infringe on the owners’ Fourth Amendment rights. There is no significant difference between the instant ordinance and that involved in Loventhal. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Hargett, JJ., concur.