Opinion · Nylaw New York

KATZ v. YOUNG, 63 A.D.2d 942 [1st Dept 1978]

63 A.D.2d 942

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1978-06-27
Topic: general

KATZ v. YOUNG, 63 A.D.2d 942 [1st Dept 1978] CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RICHARD YOUNG, Appellant.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. DAVID VAUGHN, Appellant.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RONALD ROBINSON et al., Appellants.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KATZ v. YOUNG, 63 A.D.2d 942 [1st Dept 1978]. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KATZ v. YOUNG,63 A.D.2d 942[1st Dept 1978]

CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RICHARD YOUNG, Appellant.

CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. DAVID VAUGHN, Appellant.

CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RONALD ROBINSON et al., Appellants.

CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. JAMES RUFFIN, Appellant.

CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RITA CARRINGTON, Appellant.

CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. MILTON R. BROWNE, Appellant.

CURTIS KATZ, Respondent v. DOROTHY MONTGOMERY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

June 27, 1978

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 18, 1977, on November 29, 1977, on March 1, 1978, on March 1, 1978, on March 1, 1978, on March 1, 1978, on March 6, 1978, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Evans, Lane and Markewich, JJ.; Silverman, J., concurs on constraint ofMinton v Domb(63 A.D.2d 36).