Opinion · Nylaw New York
KATZ v. YOUNG, 63 A.D.2d 942 [1st Dept 1978]
CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RICHARD YOUNG, Appellant.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. DAVID VAUGHN, Appellant.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RONALD ROBINSON et al., Appellants.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. JAMES RUFFIN, Appellant.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RITA CARRINGTON, Appellant.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. MILTON R. BROWNE, Appellant.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent v. DOROTHY MONTGOMERY, Appellant., 63 A.D.2d
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1978-06-27
- Topic
- general
KATZ v. YOUNG, 63 A.D.2d 942 [1st Dept 1978] CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RICHARD YOUNG, Appellant.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. DAVID VAUGHN, Appellant.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v. RONALD ROBINSON et al., Appellants.CURTIS KATZ, Respondent, v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed KATZ v. YOUNG, 63 A.D.2d 942 [1st Dept 1978]. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Evans, Lane and Markewich, JJ.; Silverman, J., concurs on constraint ofMinton v Domb(63 A.D.2d 36).