Opinion · Nylaw New York

ROSE v. AVON ASSOCIATES, INC., 58 A.D.2d 547 [1st Dept 1977]

CORNELIUS C. ROSE, JR., et al., Appellants, v. AVON ASSOCIATES, INC., etal., Respondents, et al., Defendants., 58 A.D.2d 547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1977)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1977-06-28
Topic
general

ROSE v. AVON ASSOCIATES, INC., 58 A.D.2d 547 [1st Dept 1977] CORNELIUS C. ROSE, JR., et al., Appellants, v. AVON ASSOCIATES, INC., etal., Respondents, et al., Defendants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. June 28, 1977 Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 10, 1976, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to reduce the commission to the receiver to $15,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ROSE v. AVON ASSOCIATES, INC., 58 A.D.2d 547 [1st Dept 1977]. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ROSE v. AVON ASSOCIATES, INC.,58 A.D.2d 547[1st Dept 1977]
CORNELIUS C. ROSE, JR., et al., Appellants, v. AVON ASSOCIATES, INC., et
al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
June 28, 1977
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 10, 1976, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to reduce the commission to the receiver to $15,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In view of the fact that a real estate agent and legal counsel were also involved in this matter, the commission to the receiver was excessive to the extent indicated.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Birns, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.