Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

People v. Kee

People v. Kee, 45 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 1974)

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1974-06-25
Topic
general

Judgment of conviction, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered December 3, 1973, after trial to a jury, unanimously affirmed. We have heard the tapes concerning which the claim of inaudibility has been raised. While in the main they are unintelligible, those parts which are clearly heard sufficiently implicate defendant to corroborate the accomplice’s evidence against him,- The trial court’s conduct reflected a certain border-line assertiveness and a greater measure of judicial restraint would have been more in order. Con*705sidering, however, the overwhelming proof of guilt, we do not find that conduct sufficient to warrant reversal. Concur — McGivern, P.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Kee. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

Judgment of conviction, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered December 3, 1973, after trial to a jury, unanimously affirmed. We have heard the tapes concerning which the claim of inaudibility has been raised. While in the main they are unintelligible, those parts which are clearly heard sufficiently implicate defendant to corroborate the accomplice’s evidence against him,- The trial court’s conduct reflected a certain border-line assertiveness and a greater measure of judicial restraint would have been more in order. Con *705 sidering, however, the overwhelming proof of guilt, we do not find that conduct sufficient to warrant reversal. Concur — McGivern, P. J., Markewich, Nunez, Lupiano and Capozzoli, JJ.