Opinion · Nylaw New York

SIEGEL v. R.C. WILLIAMS CO. INC., 3 A.D.2d 902 [1st Dept 1957]

MAX SIEGEL et al., Doing Bus. as SIEGEL GREEN, Appellants, v. R.C.WILLIAMS CO. INC., Respondent., 3 A.D.2d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1957)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1957-05-21
Topic: general

SIEGEL v. R.C. WILLIAMS CO. INC., 3 A.D.2d 902 [1st Dept 1957] MAX SIEGEL et al., Doing Business as SIEGEL GREEN, Appellants, v. R.C.WILLIAMS CO.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SIEGEL v. R.C. WILLIAMS CO. INC., 3 A.D.2d 902 [1st Dept 1957]. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SIEGEL v. R.C. WILLIAMS CO. INC.,3 A.D.2d 902[1st Dept 1957]

MAX SIEGEL et al., Doing Business as SIEGEL GREEN, Appellants, v. R.C.

WILLIAMS CO. INC., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

May 21, 1957

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Although an accounting is not the proper relief or remedy, the pleading is sufficient to comprise a defense or counterclaim for unjust enrichment.

Concur — Peck, P.J., Botein, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.