Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Brabson v. Wilkins
25 A.D.2d 610
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1966-02-24
- Topic
- general
Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum, and as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner asserts and respondent admits that respondent Warden intercepted and refused to transmit through the mails correspondence written by petitioner and addressed to the P. B. I., U. S.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brabson v. Wilkins. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum, and as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner asserts and respondent admits that respondent Warden intercepted and refused to transmit through the mails correspondence written by petitioner and addressed to the P. B. I., U. S. Attorney General and the Civil Rights Division. This correspondence dealt generally with petitioner’s complaint about dental care. Petitioner also asserts and respondent admits interception of a letter addressed by petitioner to his court-assigned attorney dealing with a complaint that a guard ransacked his cell and planted evidence upon which he based prison punishment. The order appealed from provided that “the respondent be directed and instructed to cease and desist from intercepting, obstructing or otherwise delaying any communications addressed to any Court, to any law enforcement agency, to any executive official of the Federal or State Government and to the prisoner’s attorney”. The petitioner has a right to seek the help of the courts, any law enforcement agency, and any executive official of the Federal or State Government concerning his complaints about unlawful treatment by prison authorities. Likewise the petitioner and any prison inmate has the right to communicate with his