Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sullivan v. Joy Manufacturing Co.
Sullivan v. Joy Mfg. Co., 125 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 1986)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1986-12-19
- Topic
- general
— Order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and appellant’s motion granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff was seriously injured when a five-foot long ice chopper he was using to remove ice cream packages from a conveyor tray on a Greer harden*996ing machine came into contact with a blade of a high-speed vane-axial cooling fan, causing a piece of the blade to break off striking him in the left eye. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was standing on a 20- to 30-inch catwalk between the conveyor portion of the hardening machine and the vane-axial fans. Special Term erred in determining that a special relationship existed between defendant J.W. Greer, Inc. and plaintiffs employer which imposed a duty on Greer to warn plaintiffs employer of the dangers inherent in using high-speed vane-axial fans in conjunction with a Greer hardening machine. The only contact between defendant Greer, successor to the manufacturer of the Greer hardening machine, and plaintiffs employer was a single service call.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sullivan v. Joy Manufacturing Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
— Order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and appellant’s motion granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff was seriously injured when a five-foot long ice chopper he was using to remove ice cream packages from a conveyor tray on a Greer harden