Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Marco v. Sachs
Marco v. Sachs, 1 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 1956)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1956-02-27
- Topic
- general
In a stockholder’s derivative action, the appeal is from an order which denied, without prejudice, appellants’ motion to disqualify respondents’ attorneys from appearing for, representing or aiding any of the respondents in said action. Prior to the argument of the appeal, and on October 27, 1955, this court denied respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal, with leave to renew on the argument of the appeal; the motion has been renewed. Renewed motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See Marco v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Marco v. Sachs. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
In a stockholder’s derivative action, the appeal is from an order which denied, without prejudice, appellants’ motion to disqualify respondents’ attorneys from appearing for, representing or aiding any of the respondents in said action. Prior to the argument of the appeal, and on October 27, 1955, this court denied respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal, with leave to renew on the argument of the appeal; the motion has been renewed. Renewed motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See Marco v. Sachs, ante, p. 849, decided herewith.) The Special Term did not have jurisdiction to grant the motion. (See Erie Co. Water Auth. v. Western N. Y. Water Co., 304 N. Y. 342.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.