Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Whitney v. Wenman
Whitney v. Wenman, 89 N.Y.S. 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 1904)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1904-07-15
- Topic
- general
Laughlin, J. (concurring): I concur in the result. I am of opinion that a demurrer would lie without first separately stating and numbering the causes of action; but section 483 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires that causes of action shall be separately stated and numbered, and this requirement should be complied-with. Order reversed, with -ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Whitney v. Wenman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
I concur in the result. I am of opinion that a demurrer would lie without first separately stating and numbering the causes of action; but section 483 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires that causes of action shall be separately stated and numbered, and this requirement should be complied-with.
Order reversed, with -ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.