Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Matharu v. Muir

Matharu v. Muir, 73 A.3d 576 (Pa. 2013)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Date: 2013-08-22
Topic: bankruptcy

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is *577REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., — Pa. -, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012). Petitioners’ Application to Remand this Matter to Superior Court for Reconsideration in Light of Seebold, is DISMISSED as moot. Justice Baer dissents and would deny the allocatur petition as he views Seebold v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matharu v. Muir. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is *577 REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., — Pa. -, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012).

Petitioners’ Application to Remand this Matter to Superior Court for Reconsideration in Light of Seebold, is DISMISSED as moot.

Justice Baer dissents and would deny the allocatur petition as he views Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., — Pa. -, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012) as distinguishable from this case.