Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Carela-Tolentino

616 Pa. 423

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
2012-07-17
Topic
bankruptcy

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 17th day of July, 2012, the order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED. Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the decision of this case. Justice SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and McCAFFERY join the per curiam affirmance. Chief Justice CASTILLE files a dissenting statement in which Justice TODD joins.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commonwealth v. Carela-Tolentino. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of July, 2012, the order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the decision of this case.

Justice SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and McCAFFERY join the per curiam affirmance.

Chief Justice CASTILLE files a dissenting statement in which Justice TODD joins.