Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
MIRJAVADI v. VAKILZADEH, 301 Conn. 929 (2011)
23 A.3d 724
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2011-06-30
- Topic
- general
MIRJAVADI v. VAKILZADEH, 301 Conn. 929 (2011) 23 A.3d 724 LEYLA MIRJAVADI ET AL. v. ANTHONY VAKILZADEH ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant Maria Varone's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 61 (AC 30608), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that several of the facts found by the trial court were clearly erroneous, and, therefore, the judgment in favor of the defendant must be reversed?" ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MIRJAVADI v. VAKILZADEH, 301 Conn. 929 (2011). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that several of the facts found by the trial court were clearly erroneous, and, therefore, the judgment in favor of the defendant must be reversed?"Page 930
ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18813.Lloyd D. Pedersen, in support of the petition.Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition.