Opinion · New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Dimitrakopoulos v. Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman & Stahl, P.C.
Dimitrakopoulos v. Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman & Stahl, P.C., 179 A.3d 1041 (N.J. 2018)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 2018-02-09
- Topic
- general
Evangelos DIMITRAKOPOULOS and Matilde Dimitrakopoulos, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. BORRUS, GOLDIN, FOLEY, VIGNUOLO, HYMAN AND STAHL, P.C., Steven L. Fox, Esq. and Anthony B. Vignuolo, Esq., Defendants-Respondents, and Frazer Evangelista & Company, LLC, and Ralph J. Evangelista, Defendants.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dimitrakopoulos v. Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman & Stahl, P.C.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Evangelos DIMITRAKOPOULOS and Matilde Dimitrakopoulos, Plaintiffs-Petitioners,
v.
BORRUS, GOLDIN, FOLEY, VIGNUOLO, HYMAN AND STAHL, P.C., Steven L. Fox, Esq. and Anthony B. Vignuolo, Esq., Defendants-Respondents,
and
Frazer Evangelista & Company, LLC, and Ralph J. Evangelista, Defendants.
C-592 September Term, 2017
080357
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
February 9, 2018
To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:
A petition for certification of the judgment in A-000880-16 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;
It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted.