Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. PAPANDREA, 297 Conn. 902 (2010)
STATE OF Conn. v. JOHN PAPANDREA., 994 A.2d 1289 (Conn. 2010)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2010-05-20
- Topic
- general
STATE v. PAPANDREA, 297 Conn. 902 (2010) STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN PAPANDREA. 994 A.2d 1289Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 224 (AC 29768), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state of Connecticut had presented sufficient evidence of the defendant's intent to commit larceny?" Moira L. Buckley, in support of the petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. PAPANDREA, 297 Conn. 902 (2010). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STATE v. PAPANDREA,297 Conn. 902(2010)
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN PAPANDREA.
994 A.2d 1289
Supreme Court of Connecticut
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state of Connecticut had presented sufficient evidence of the defendant's intent to commit larceny?"Page 903Moira L. Buckley, in support of the petition.
Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18616.
Decided May 20, 2010