Opinion · Delaware Court Opinions

BIGGINS v. PHELPS, 986 A.2d 1164 (Del. 2010)

Biggins v. Phelps., 986 A.2d 1164 (Del. 2010)

Type
Opinion
Court
Delaware Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Delaware
Date
2010-01-06
Topic
general

BIGGINS v. PHELPS, 986 A.2d 1164 (Del. 2010) Biggins v. Phelps. No. 702, 2009.Supreme Court of Delaware. January 6, 2010.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BIGGINS v. PHELPS, 986 A.2d 1164 (Del. 2010). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BIGGINS v. PHELPS,986 A.2d 1164(Del. 2010)
Biggins v. Phelps.
No. 702, 2009.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
January 6, 2010.
Court Below — Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for Kent County, C.A. No. 5121.
ORDER
MYRON T. STEELE, Chief Justice.
This 6th day of January 2010, it appears to the Court that on December 4, 2009, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an apparent interlocutory order. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.