Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State of Connecticut v. Lewis
State of Conn. v. Lewis, 292 Conn. 906 (Conn. 2009)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2009-06-03
- Topic
- international-arbitration
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 731 (AC 28791), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Whether, for the purposes of proof of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), a majority of the Appellate Court panel properly held that there was insufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to sell the narcotics that he possessed at the specific location where he was apprehended, which was within 1500 feet of a school? “2. Whether, for purposes of proof of both General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school, and General Statutes § 2 la-267 (c), possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use within 1500 feet of a school, a majority of the Appellate Court panel properly held that there was insufficient evidence that the school in question was an elementary or secondary school?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State of Connecticut v. Lewis. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 731 (AC 28791), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Whether, for the purposes of proof of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), a majority of the Appellate Court panel properly held that there was insufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to sell the narcotics that he possessed at the specific location where he was apprehended, which was within 1500 feet of a school?
“2. Whether, for purposes of proof of both General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school, and General Statutes § 2 la-267 (c), possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use within 1500 feet of a school, a majority of the Appellate Court panel properly held that there was insufficient evidence that the school in question was an elementary or secondary school?”