Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. OUELLETTE, 289 Conn. 951 (2008)
STATE OF Conn. v. DANIEL J. OUELLETTE., 961 A.2d 417 (Conn. 2008)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2008-11-24
- Topic
- general
STATE v. OUELLETTE, 289 Conn. 951 (2008) 961 A.2d 417 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DANIEL J. OUELLETTE.Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 110 Conn. App. 401 (AC 27531), is granted, limited to the following issue: "In circumstances where the prosecutor adduced evidence that the state had entered into a plea agreement with its key witness pursuant to which the state would seek a particular sentence but then, after that witness' trial testimony, the state recommended a different, more lenient sentence for the witness, did the Appellate Court improperly refuse to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether the state's conduct violated the defendant's due process rights?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18273.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. OUELLETTE, 289 Conn. 951 (2008). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"In circumstances where the prosecutor adduced evidence that the state had entered into a plea agreement with its key witness pursuant to which the state would seek a particular sentence but then, after that witness' trial testimony, the state recommended a different, more lenient sentence for the witness, did the Appellate Court improperly refuse to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whetherPage 952the state's conduct violated the defendant's due process rights?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18273.Richard A. Reeve, special public defender, in support of the petition.Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.