Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

BOHRMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, 11 N.J. 496 (1953)

PHILIP BOHRMAN, Adm’r, Adm’x AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE Est. OF BEVERLY M.BOHRMAN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. Pa. R.R. COMPANY,DEFENDANT-PETITIONER., 95 A.2d 35 (N.J. 1953)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1953-02-24
Topic: general

BOHRMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, 11 N.J. 496 (1953) 95 A.2d 35 PHILIP BOHRMAN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF BEVERLY M.BOHRMAN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 24, 1953. Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BOHRMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, 11 N.J. 496 (1953). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BOHRMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,11 N.J. 496(1953)

95 A.2d 35

PHILIP BOHRMAN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF BEVERLY M.

BOHRMAN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,

DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

February 24, 1953.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Messrs. Strong Strongfor the petitioner.Mr. Francis M. Seamanfor the respondent.

Denied.