Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
In Re Nomination Petition of Farnese
596 Pa. 464
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2008-04-08
- Topic
- international-arbitration
ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2008, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby affirmed in part. The portion *465 of the order denying the Petition to Set Aside the Nomination Petition of Lawrence M. Farnese, Jr., is affirmed. This order is entered without prejudice to the Appellants to seek review of any future order of the Commonwealth Court which may impose a final order of costs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Nomination Petition of Farnese. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2008, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby affirmed in part. The portion *465 of the order denying the Petition to Set Aside the Nomination Petition of Lawrence M. Farnese, Jr., is affirmed. This order is entered without prejudice to the Appellants to seek review of any future order of the Commonwealth Court which may impose a final order of costs. See In re Nomination Paper of Nader, 588 Pa. 450, 461-62, 905 A.2d 450, 457 (2006). We further direct that the Commonwealth Court’s final order assessing costs, if any, shall reference such costs by category and amount assessed and shall include a statement of rationale for the imposition of such costs.