Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

FANARO v. BOROUGH AND COUNCIL OF SOUTH BOUND BROOK, 194 N.J. 263 (2008)

ORESTE & ERNA FANARO, TRUSTEES (ORESTE FANARO, DECEASED),PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, & FANARO P’ship (ERNA FANARO, SUCCESSORAND SOLE PARTNER), PLAINTIFF, v. BOROUGH & COUNCIL OF S. BOUNDBROOK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS., 944 A.2d 25 (N.J. 2008)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 2008-02-21
Topic: general

FANARO v. BOROUGH AND COUNCIL OF SOUTH BOUND BROOK, 194 N.J. 263 (2008) 944 A.2d 25 ORESTE AND ERNA FANARO, TRUSTEES (ORESTE FANARO, DECEASED),PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, AND FANARO PARTNERSHIP (ERNA FANARO, SUCCESSORAND SOLE PARTNER), PLAINTIFF, v. BOROUGH AND COUNCIL OF SOUTH BOUNDBROOK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 21, 2008. AND OTHER RELATED CASES.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FANARO v. BOROUGH AND COUNCIL OF SOUTH BOUND BROOK, 194 N.J. 263 (2008). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FANARO v. BOROUGH AND COUNCIL OF SOUTH BOUND BROOK,194 N.J. 263(2008)

944 A.2d 25

ORESTE AND ERNA FANARO, TRUSTEES (ORESTE FANARO, DECEASED),

PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, AND FANARO PARTNERSHIP (ERNA FANARO, SUCCESSOR

AND SOLE PARTNER), PLAINTIFF, v. BOROUGH AND COUNCIL OF SOUTH BOUND

BROOK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

February 21, 2008.

AND OTHER RELATED CASES.

Denied.