Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

STATE v. DANIELS, 106 Conn. App. 901 (2008)

STATE OF Conn. v. MABEL DANIELS, 941 A.2d 1007 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2008-03-04
Topic
general

STATE v. DANIELS, 106 Conn. App. 901 (2008) 941 A.2d 1007 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MABEL DANIELS (AC 28227)Appellate Court of Connecticut Gruendel, Lavine and Peters, Js. Argued February 8, 2008 Officially released March 4, 2008 Defendant's appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Fairfield, geographical area number two, Ginocchio, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. DANIELS, 106 Conn. App. 901 (2008). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. DANIELS,106 Conn. App. 901(2008)
941 A.2d 1007
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MABEL DANIELS
(AC 28227)
Appellate Court of Connecticut
Gruendel, Lavine and Peters, Js.
Argued February 8, 2008
Officially released March 4, 2008
Defendant's appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Fairfield, geographical area number two,Ginocchio, J.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.