Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

FINE HOMEBUILDERS v. PERRONE, 282 Conn. 901 (2007)

FINE HOMEBUILDERS, INC. v. DIANE PERRONE ET AL.[fn*], 918 A.2d 888 (Conn. 2007)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2007-03-21
Topic
general

FINE HOMEBUILDERS v. PERRONE, 282 Conn. 901 (2007) 918 A.2d 888 FINE HOMEBUILDERS, INC. v. DIANE PERRONE ET AL.[fn*]Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 852 (AC 26714), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that a state marshal's service of process at a locked front gate of a gated single-family estate was sufficient service of process?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17877. Stephen A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FINE HOMEBUILDERS v. PERRONE, 282 Conn. 901 (2007). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FINE HOMEBUILDERS v. PERRONE,282 Conn. 901(2007)
918 A.2d 888
FINE HOMEBUILDERS, INC.v.DIANE PERRONE ET AL.fn*
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,98 Conn. App. 852(AC 26714), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that a state marshal's service of process at a locked front gate of a gated single-family estate was sufficient service of process?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17877.Stephen A. FinnandAlex K. Sherman, in support of the petition.Jeffrey M. Sklarz, in opposition.
Decided March 21, 2007.
  1. The appeal was withdrawn October 24, 2007. ↩