Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. DALZELL, 280 Conn. 914 (2006)
STATE OF Conn. v. EDWARD R. DALZELL, 908 A.2d 539 (Conn. 2006)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2006-09-20
- Topic
- general
STATE v. DALZELL, 280 Conn. 914 (2006) 908 A.2d 539 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. EDWARD R. DALZELLSupreme Court of Connecticut The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 96 Conn. App. 515 (AC 26255), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly reach the question whether the defendant's arrest for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs was based on probable cause, and, if so, did it properly conclude that probable cause was lacking?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17736.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. DALZELL, 280 Conn. 914 (2006). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"Did the Appellate Court properly reach the question whether the defendant's arrest for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs was based on probable cause, and, if so, did it properly conclude that probable cause was lacking?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17736.
Robert J. Scheinblum,senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Elizabeth M. Inkster,senior assistant public defender, in opposition.