Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In Re a Condemnaton Proceeding in Rem by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia

588 Pa. 759

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
2006-07-27
Topic
finance

A CONDEMNATON PROCEEDING IN REM BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FOR THE PURPOSE OF REDEVELOPMENT OF NORTH PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AREA MODEL CITIES URBAN RENEWAL AREA CONDEMNATION NO. 30 B PHILADELPHIA, PA INCLUDING CERTAIN LAND IMPROVEMENTS AND PROPERTIES RE: 1839 NORTH EIGHTH STREET PETITION OF: REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA No. 109 EAL 2006. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District. July 27, 2006. ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 27th day of July 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Petition for Expedited Consideration of Petition and to Set Expedited Schedule for Briefing and Oral Argument is DENIED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re a Condemnaton Proceeding in Rem by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions

A CONDEMNATON PROCEEDING IN REM BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FOR THE PURPOSE OF REDEVELOPMENT OF NORTH PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AREA MODEL CITIES URBAN RENEWAL AREA CONDEMNATION NO. 30 B PHILADELPHIA, PA INCLUDING CERTAIN LAND IMPROVEMENTS AND PROPERTIES
RE: 1839 NORTH EIGHTH STREET
PETITION OF: REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

No. 109 EAL 2006.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.

July 27, 2006.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of July 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED.

The Petition for Expedited Consideration of Petition and to Set Expedited Schedule for Briefing and Oral Argument is DENIED.