Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Eisenstein
9 N.J. 347
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1952-05-12
- Topic
- litigation
Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the court below. For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Waohenpeld, Burling and Brennan — 6. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Eisenstein. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Waohenpeld, Burling and Brennan — 6.
For reversal — None.