Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons
9 N.J. 294
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1952-05-05
- Topic
- litigation
Per Curiam. The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below. For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and Jacobs — 5. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 17 opinions
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and Jacobs — 5.
For reversal — None.