Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

DOE v. CHRISTOFORO, 273 Conn. 920 (2005)

JOHN DOE v. JOHN M. CHRISTOFORO, 871 A.2d 1027 (Conn. 2005)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2005-03-31
Topic: general

DOE v. CHRISTOFORO, 273 Conn. 920 (2005) 871 A.2d 1027 JOHN DOE v. JOHN M. CHRISTOFORO ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut. The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DOE v. CHRISTOFORO, 273 Conn. 920 (2005). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DOE v. CHRISTOFORO,273 Conn. 920(2005)

871 A.2d 1027

JOHN DOE v. JOHN M. CHRISTOFORO ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,87 Conn. App. 359(AC 23908), is granted, limited to the following issue:Page 921

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly excluded the defendant's statement from evidence?"

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17400.

William F. GallagherandDavid McCarry, in support of the petition.Eric J. StockmanandMaureen Sullivan Dinnan, in opposition.

Decided March 31, 2005.

ORDERS.