Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORPORATION v. MURO, 273 Conn. 907 (2005)

EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE Corp. v. ANTHONY L. MURO, JR., 868 A.2d 747 (Conn. 2005)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2005-02-16
Topic: general

EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORPORATION v. MURO, 273 Conn. 907 (2005) 868 A.2d 747 EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORPORATION v. ANTHONY L. MURO, JR., ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut. The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORPORATION v. MURO, 273 Conn. 907 (2005). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORPORATION v. MURO,273 Conn. 907(2005)

868 A.2d 747

EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORPORATION v. ANTHONY L. MURO, JR., ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,86 Conn. App. 551(AC 24392/AC 24393/AC 24394), is denied.

Darren P. Renner, in support of the petition.Thomas P. Willcutts, in opposition.

Decided February 16, 2005.

ORDERS.