Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

STATE v. ARRINGTON, 268 Conn. 922 (2004)

STATE OF Conn. v. ROBERT ARRINGTON[fn*], 846 A.2d 881 (Conn. 2004)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2004-04-07
Topic
general

STATE v. ARRINGTON, 268 Conn. 922 (2004) 846 A.2d 881 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ROBERT ARRINGTON[fn*]Supreme Court of Connecticut [fn1] The appeal was withdrawn and the Appellate Court judgment was vacated April 21, 2005. The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 518 (AC 23438), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court's ruling precluding evidence of a prosecution witness' intent to file a civil action against the defendant was harmless error?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17170.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. ARRINGTON, 268 Conn. 922 (2004). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. ARRINGTON,268 Conn. 922(2004)
846 A.2d 881
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ROBERT ARRINGTONfn*
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,81 Conn. App. 518(AC 23438), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court's ruling precluding evidence of a prosecution witness' intent to file a civil action against the defendant was harmless error?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17170.Jeffrey R. BabbinandKim E. Rinehart, in support of the petition.Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Decided April 7, 2004
  1. The appeal was withdrawn and the Appellate Court judgment was vacated April 21, 2005. ↩