Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.

266 Conn. 906

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2003-09-18
Topic
litigation

The petition for certification by the New York Times Company, Globe Newspaper Company, Inc., and the Washington Post Company for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 690 (AC 23014/AC 23015/AC 23016/AC 23017/AC 23069/AC 23078/AC 23079/AC 23161), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the application to create a new file?” *907The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17060. James S. Rollins and Kimberly M. White, in support of the petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

The petition for certification by the New York Times Company, Globe Newspaper Company, Inc., and the Washington Post Company for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 690 (AC 23014/AC 23015/AC 23016/AC 23017/AC 23069/AC 23078/AC 23079/AC 23161), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the application to create a new file?”
*907 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17060. James S. Rollins and Kimberly M. White, in support of the petition. John B. Farley, Joseph T. Sweeney, Ralph W. Johnson III, James V. Somers, James F. Stapleton, John F. Conway and W. Glen Pierson, in opposition. Decided September 18, 2003

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.