Opinion · Palaw Pennsylvania

BUCK HILL FALLS CO. v. PRESS, 573 Pa. 688 (2003)

BUCK HILL FALLS Co., Respondent v. CLIFFORD PRESS & ELIZABETH L.SAWYER, HIS WIFE, Petitioners., 825 A.2d 637 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District. 2003)

Type
Opinion
Court
Palaw Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Palaw
Date
2003-06-03
Topic
general

BUCK HILL FALLS CO. v. PRESS, 573 Pa. 688 (2003) 825 A.2d 637 BUCK HILL FALLS COMPANY, Respondent v. CLIFFORD PRESS AND ELIZABETH L.SAWYER, HIS WIFE, Petitioners. No. 126 MAL 2002.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District. June 3, 2003.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BUCK HILL FALLS CO. v. PRESS, 573 Pa. 688 (2003). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BUCK HILL FALLS CO. v. PRESS,573 Pa. 688(2003)
825 A.2d 637
BUCK HILL FALLS COMPANY, Respondent v. CLIFFORD PRESS AND ELIZABETH L.
SAWYER, HIS WIFE, Petitioners.
No. 126 MAL 2002.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
June 3, 2003.
No. 126 MAL 2002, Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.