Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

LEMING v. HARRAH'S HOTEL, 175 N.J. 543 (2003)

LAWRENCE J. LEMING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARRAH'S HOTEL CASINO & JOHN DOES, 1-25 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), INDIVIDUALLY,JOINTLY SEVERALLY AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS., 816 A.2d 1046 (N.J. 2003)

Type
Opinion
Court
Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Njlaw
Date
2003-01-01
Topic
general

LEMING v. HARRAH'S HOTEL, 175 N.J. 543 (2003) 816 A.2d 1046 LAWRENCE J. LEMING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARRAH'S HOTEL CASINO AND JOHN DOES, 1-25 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), INDIVIDUALLY,JOINTLY SEVERALLY AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 4, 2003Prior Report: 174 N.J. 190, 803 A.2d 1161 ORDER This Matter having been duly considered and the Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted; It is ORDERED that the within appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LEMING v. HARRAH'S HOTEL, 175 N.J. 543 (2003). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LEMING v. HARRAH'S HOTEL,175 N.J. 543(2003)
816 A.2d 1046
LAWRENCE J. LEMING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARRAH'S HOTEL
CASINO AND JOHN DOES, 1-25 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), INDIVIDUALLY,
JOINTLY SEVERALLY AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE,
DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
February 4, 2003
Prior Report:174 N.J. 190,803 A.2d 1161
ORDER
This Matter having been duly considered and the Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN join in this decision.Page 544