Opinion · Palaw Pennsylvania

SUDDUTH v. TOMSIC OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, 572 Pa. 709 (2002)

ROY SUDDUTH, Petitioner v. TOMSIC OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, A PENNSYLVANIACORPORATION, Gen. MOTORS Corp., A Del. CORPORATIONAND JOYCE IANNARELLI, Respondents., 813 A.2d 844 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District. 2002)

Type: Opinion
Court: Palaw Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Palaw
Date: 2002-12-18
Topic: general

SUDDUTH v. TOMSIC OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, 572 Pa. 709 (2002) 813 A.2d 844 ROY SUDDUTH, Petitioner v. TOMSIC OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, A PENNSYLVANIACORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATIONAND JOYCE IANNARELLI, Respondents. No. 503 WAL 2002 — 505 WAL 2002.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District. December 18, 2002.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SUDDUTH v. TOMSIC OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, 572 Pa. 709 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SUDDUTH v. TOMSIC OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC,572 Pa. 709(2002)

813 A.2d 844

ROY SUDDUTH, Petitioner v. TOMSIC OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, A PENNSYLVANIA

CORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION

AND JOYCE IANNARELLI, Respondents.

No. 503 WAL 2002 — 505 WAL 2002.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.

December 18, 2002.

No. 503-505 WAL 2002, Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 18th day of December 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.