Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

DACRUZ v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, 261 Conn. 938 (2002)

808 A.2d 1132

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2002-09-27
Topic
general

DACRUZ v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, 261 Conn. 938 (2002) 808 A.2d 1132 DAVID J. DACRUZ v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 507 (AC 20884), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff may recover against the defendant pursuant to General Statutes § 38a-321 as a matter of law?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16847.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DACRUZ v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, 261 Conn. 938 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DACRUZ v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,261 Conn. 938(2002)
808 A.2d 1132
DAVID J. DACRUZ v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,69 Conn. App. 507(AC 20884), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff may recover against the defendant pursuant to General Statutes §38a-321as a matter of law?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16847.James N. TallbergandBarbara A. Frederick, in support of the petition.
Decided September 27, 2002