Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

MILLER'S POND COMPANY v. ROCQUE, 261 Conn. 936 (2002)

MILLER'S POND Co. v. ARTHUR J. ROCQUE, Comm’r OFENVIRONMENTAL Prot., 806 A.2d 1064 (Conn. 2002)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2002-09-19
Topic: general

MILLER'S POND COMPANY v. ROCQUE, 261 Conn. 936 (2002) 806 A.2d 1064 MILLER'S POND COMPANY, LLC v. ARTHUR J. ROCQUE, COMMISSIONER OFENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONSupreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 71 Conn. App. 395 (AC 21850), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the actions of the defendant, the commissioner of environmental protection, was a final decision in a contested case within the meaning of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16834.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MILLER'S POND COMPANY v. ROCQUE, 261 Conn. 936 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MILLER'S POND COMPANY v. ROCQUE,261 Conn. 936(2002)

806 A.2d 1064

MILLER'S POND COMPANY, LLC v. ARTHUR J. ROCQUE, COMMISSIONER OF

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,71 Conn. App. 395(AC 21850), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the actions of the defendant, the commissioner of environmental protection, was a final decision in a contested case within the meaning of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16834.Richard F. Webb, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition.Richard S. Cody, in opposition.

Decided September 19, 2002