Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Francis
261 Conn. 925
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2002-09-12
- Topic
- general
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 70 Conn. App. 571 (AC 21647), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly determined that certain requested psychiatric assessment records did not contain any information that required disclosure to the defense?” KATZ and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Francis. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 70 Conn. App. 571 (AC 21647), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly determined that certain requested psychiatric assessment records did not contain any information that required disclosure to the defense?”
KATZ and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.