Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Clark

State v. Clark, 260 Conn. 906 (Conn. 2002)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2002-03-28
Topic
general

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 19 (AC 18775), is granted, limited to the following issue: *907The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16713. Sheila A. Huddleston and Karen T. Staib, special public defenders, in support of the petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Clark. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 19 (AC 18775), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*907 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16713. Sheila A. Huddleston and Karen T. Staib, special public defenders, in support of the petition. Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided March 28, 2002

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant had failed to establish a constitutional violation in the trial court’s instructions on the law of self-defense?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.