Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Edelman
State v. Edelman, 258 Conn. 940 (Conn. 2001)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2001-11-14
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 480 (AC 20145), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Under the plain error doctrine, should the defendant’s conviction be reversed and judgment be directed in his favor, on the ground that there was no evidence that the defendant unlawfully continued to work under § 118.2 of the state building code?” NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Edelman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 480 (AC 20145), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the plain error doctrine, should the defendant’s conviction be reversed and judgment be directed in his favor, on the ground that there was no evidence that the defendant unlawfully continued to work under § 118.2 of the state building code?”
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.