Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority
780 A.2d 601
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2001-08-01
- Topic
- general
The CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Petitioner, v. The PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, Joseph T. Ashdale, Michael A. Cibik, Catherine Marshall, Alfred W. Taubenberger, Russell R.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
The CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Petitioner, v. The PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, Joseph T. Ashdale, Michael A. Cibik, Catherine Marshall, Alfred W. Taubenberger, Russell R. Wagner, Karen M. Wrigley, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 1, 2001.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2001, the Emergency Application for Stay seeking relief as of July 23, 2001, is hereby DENIED as moot. The Petition for King’s Bench is hereby DENIED.
The appeal shall be entertained on an expedited basis and the prothonotary is directed to issue a briefing schedule in accordance therewith. The parties should concentrate their argument on the question of whether the Commonwealth Court had original jurisdiction to entertain this action. Further implementation of Act 22 of 2001 is stayed pending resolution of this appeal.
Justices NEWMAN and SAYLOR dissent from that portion of the order staying further implementation of Act 22 of 2001 pending the resolution of the appeal.