Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE CO. v. PREMIER TITLE AGENCY, 166 N.J. 2 (2000)

CONESTOGA TITLE Ins. CO., PLAINTIFF & THIRD PARTYPLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PREMIER TITLE AGENCY, INC., F/K/A STEWART TITLEAGENCY OF SALEM COUNTY, ROBERT M. WURSTER, PATRICIA J. WURSTER, GEORGEHAMPTON, BEVERLY HAMPTON, KEVIN MARK MARINI, WILLIAM MCINTYRE, JANET M.MCINTYRE, PATRICIA J. MCMAHON, MARGARET M. MCMAHON, RICHARD K. HUMPHREYS,SHERRY J. HUMPHREYS, JOHN T. SEGICH, LAURA M. SEGICH, FREDERICE HU

Type
Opinion
Court
New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
2000-12-13
Topic
general

CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE CO. v. PREMIER TITLE AGENCY, 166 N.J. 2 (2000) 763 A.2d 746 CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE CO., PLAINTIFF AND THIRD PARTYPLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PREMIER TITLE AGENCY, INC., F/K/A STEWART TITLEAGENCY OF SALEM COUNTY, ROBERT M. WURSTER, PATRICIA J. WURSTER, GEORGEHAMPTON, BEVERLY HAMPTON, KEVIN MARK MARINI, WILLIAM MCINTYRE, JANET M.MCINTYRE, PATRICIA J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE CO. v. PREMIER TITLE AGENCY, 166 N.J. 2 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE CO. v. PREMIER TITLE AGENCY,166 N.J. 2(2000)
763 A.2d 746
CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE CO., PLAINTIFF AND THIRD PARTY
PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PREMIER TITLE AGENCY, INC., F/K/A STEWART TITLE
AGENCY OF SALEM COUNTY, ROBERT M. WURSTER, PATRICIA J. WURSTER, GEORGE
HAMPTON, BEVERLY HAMPTON, KEVIN MARK MARINI, WILLIAM MCINTYRE, JANET M.
MCINTYRE, PATRICIA J. MCMAHON, MARGARET M. MCMAHON, RICHARD K. HUMPHREYS,
SHERRY J. HUMPHREYS, JOHN T. SEGICH, LAURA M. SEGICH, FREDERICE HUMPHREYS,
WILLIAM T. SMITH, SUSAN P. SMITH, BANK UNITED OF TEXAS, FSB, D/B/A
COMMONWEALTH UNITED MORTGAGE, DEFENDANTS, AND OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE
COMPANY A/K/A OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
A-111 September Term 1999
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 27, 2000
Decided December 13, 2000.
On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at328 N.J. Super. 460,746 A.2d 462(2000).
R. James Kravitz argued the cause for appellant (Fox, Roths child, O'Brien Frankel, attorneys; Jonathan D. Weiner, of counsel).

Roger P. Sauer argued the cause for respondents (Lindabury McCormick Estabrook, attorneys; Mr. Sauer and Erie B. Levine, on the brief).

Andrew S. Kent submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of amici curiae, The Surety Association of America and American Insurance Association (Wolff Samson, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Coburn's opinion of the Appellate Division, which is reported at328 N.J. Super. 460,746 A.2d 462(2000).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, VERNIERO, and LaVECCHIA and ZAZZALI — 6.
Opposed — None.
Page 3