Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

RUSTICI v. MALLOY, 254 Conn. 952 (2000)

PETER RUSTICI v. DANNEL MALLOY, 762 A.2d 906 (Conn. 2000)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2000-10-31
Topic: general

RUSTICI v. MALLOY, 254 Conn. 952 (2000) 762 A.2d 906 PETER RUSTICI ET AL. v. DANNEL MALLOY ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 47 (AC 18509), is denied. VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RUSTICI v. MALLOY, 254 Conn. 952 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RUSTICI v. MALLOY,254 Conn. 952(2000)

762 A.2d 906

PETER RUSTICI ET AL.v.DANNEL MALLOY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,60 Conn. App. 47(AC 18509), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.Andrew J. McDonald, corporation counsel, andKennethB. Povodator, assistant corporation counsel, in support of the petition.Page 953Judith A. MauzakaandLeon M. Rosenblatt, in opposition.

Decided October 31, 2000