Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 254 Conn. 952 (2000)
762 A.2d 903
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2000-10-31
- Topic
- general
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 254 Conn. 952 (2000) 762 A.2d 903 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CHARLES WILLIAMSSupreme Court of Connecticut The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 59 Conn. App. 771 (AC 20043), is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to a jury instruction regarding the doctrine of nonexclusive possession?
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. WILLIAMS, 254 Conn. 952 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STATE v. WILLIAMS,254 Conn. 952(2000)
762 A.2d 903
STATE OF CONNECTICUTv.CHARLES WILLIAMS
Supreme Court of Connecticut
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to a jury instruction regarding the doctrine of nonexclusive possession?
"2. If the answer to question one is `yes,' was the error harmless?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16415.Robin Schwartz, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.Carlos E. Candal, special public defender, in opposition.
Decided October 31, 2000