Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. HOLMES, 254 Conn. 939 (2000)
STATE OF Conn. v. WILLIAM HOLMES, JR., 761 A.2d 760 (Conn. 2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2000-10-25
- Topic
- general
STATE v. HOLMES, 254 Conn. 939 (2000) 761 A.2d 760 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. WILLIAM HOLMES, JR.Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 59 Conn. App. 484 (AC 18790), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Under the circumstances of this case, did the defendant's rights to due process and compulsory process require the state to either immunize a defense witness or to have the case against the defendant dismissed?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16410. Jeremiah Donovan, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. HOLMES, 254 Conn. 939 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"Under the circumstances of this case, did the defendant's rights to due process and compulsory process require the state to either immunize a defense witness or to have the case against the defendant dismissed?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16410.Jeremiah Donovan, special public defender, in support of the petition.Peter A. McShane, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.