Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

EMIGRANT SAVINGS BANK v. CAM, 254 Conn. 912 (2000)

EMIGRANT Sav. BANK v. VINH CAM, 759 A.2d 505 (Conn. 2000)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2000-01-01
Topic
general

EMIGRANT SAVINGS BANK v. CAM, 254 Conn. 912 (2000) 759 A.2d 505 EMIGRANT SAVINGS BANK v. VINH CAM ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendants Vinh Cam and Joseph Phung's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 20588) is denied. SULLIVAN and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. Vinh Cam, pro se, and Joseph Phung, pro se, in support of the petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed EMIGRANT SAVINGS BANK v. CAM, 254 Conn. 912 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

EMIGRANT SAVINGS BANK v. CAM,254 Conn. 912(2000)
759 A.2d 505
EMIGRANT SAVINGS BANKv.VINH CAM ET AL.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The defendants Vinh Cam and Joseph Phung's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 20588) is denied.

SULLIVAN and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.Vinh Cam, pro se, andJoseph Phung, pro se, in support of the petition.Vincent M. Marino, in opposition.
Decided September 14, 2000
Page 913