Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

BATTISTONI v. BATTISTONI, 57 Conn. App. 902 (2000)

JUNE BATTISTONI v. DAVID BATTISTONI, 748 A.2d 911 (Conn. App. Ct. 2000)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2000-04-18
Topic
general

BATTISTONI v. BATTISTONI, 57 Conn. App. 902 (2000) 748 A.2d 911 JUNE BATTISTONI v. DAVID BATTISTONI (AC 19571)Appellate Court of Connecticut Lavery, Schaller and Mihalakos, Js.[fn*] [fn*] The listing of judges reflects their seniority status on this court as of the date of oral argument. Argued March 2, 2000 Officially released April 18, 2000 Plaintiff's appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Litchfield, DiPentima, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BATTISTONI v. BATTISTONI, 57 Conn. App. 902 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BATTISTONI v. BATTISTONI,57 Conn. App. 902(2000)
748 A.2d 911
JUNE BATTISTONI v. DAVID BATTISTONI
(AC 19571)
Appellate Court of Connecticut
Lavery, Schaller and Mihalakos, Js.fn*
Argued March 2, 2000
Officially released April 18, 2000
Plaintiff's appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Litchfield,DiPentima, J.
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.
  1. The listing of judges reflects their seniority status on this court as of the date of oral argument. ↩